Hearing Summary
Hearing Date: March 19, 2009
Committee: House
Science and Technology Committee
Subcommittee:
Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight
Hearing Subject:
Accountability and Transparency in Stimulus Bill Funds for Science
House Science Committee Holds Hearing on Stimulus Funds
The House Science Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight
held a hearing on Thursday, March 19, on accountability and transparency
related to investments of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds
in science. Titled, ÒFollow the
Money: Accountability and Transparency in Recovery Act Science Funding,Ó the
hearing was convened by Subcommittee Chairman Brad Miller (D-NC) and attended
by Ranking Member Paul Broun (R-GA), Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper (D-PA), and Rep.
Brian Bilbray (R-CA).
The hearing was comprised of two panels: 1) ÒSenior Accountability
OfficersÓ responsible for planning for spending ARRA funds from the National
Science Foundation (NSF), NASA, Department of Commerce (DOC), and Department of
Energy (DOE); and 2) the Inspectors General from NSF, DOE, DOC, a
representative from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and a Research
Fellow from George Mason University.
The testimony and question-and-answer session for the first panel
focused on how the agencies are preparing – and how well they are
prepared – to manage, distribute and oversee their agenciesÕ ARRA funds. The committee also wanted to know when
the funds would be disbursed. All
of the agency representatives spelled out the various steps they are taking to
prepare for disbursement, identify potential trouble areas in contracting and
procurement, and ways the agencies are trying to collaborate.
Of particular note were comments from Dr. Cora Marrett, Acting
Deputy Director at NSF, who indicated that NSF expected to begin making awards
in the next two to three weeks, focusing on projects that were ÒdeclinedÓ
funding on or after October 1, 2008.
NSF expects the disbursement of the funds will have wide geographic
distribution. (Attached is a notice sent to the university presidents by NSF
Director Arden Bement earlier this week, describing how NSF plans to disburse
the ARRA funds.)
During the question-and-answer session, Chairman Miller raised the
growing concern voiced by the university community that Grants.gov, the federal
online grant submission mechanism, probably cannot handle the expected huge
increase in grant applications flooding the agencies. Miller suggested that the Executive Branch delay further
investments in Grants.gov and focus on developing alternative methods to submit
grant applications. The agency
representatives indicated that there are ongoing discussions among them –
especially among NSF, DOE and National Institutes of Health (NIH) – about
whether the NSF ÒFast LaneÓ program could be adapted for use by the other
agencies.
Chairman Miller also asked what kind of guidance grant recipients
would be provided regarding how to measure Òjobs created and jobs retainedÓ
through stimulus grants. The
agency staff stated that they are waiting to receive guidance from the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), but did not know when it would be issued.
The Inspector Generals and the GAO official outlined areas of
concern regarding the ability of each agency to appropriately manage and
oversee the proper use of the Recovery funds to prevent waste, fraud and
abuse. All of the IGs cited
concerns about the ability of agency staff to handle significant increases in
workload given that none had received funds for additional full-time
personnel. (In earlier testimony,
the agency representatives indicated plans to employ workload management
techniques and possibly the use of part-time, temporary staff to handle the
increase.)
Two areas of potential risk cited by the NSF IG are the Major
Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) program and monitoring
of previously-made awards. The IG
also expressed concern that the
large inflow of dollars into Òan already highly competitive arena where areas
of questionable research practices and inadequate training in the responsible
conduct of research remain unresolved, can only increase the opportunities for
abuse.Ó The IG noted further that
his office will be Òwatchful of award recipients whose financial systems may
have difficulty handling a sizable influx of funds.Ó
Copies of statements are available on the committee website at the
following URL: http://science.house.gov/publications/hearings_markups_details.aspx?NewsID=2383